Matt "Poor Decisions" Murdock (![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
devilsavocado) wrote2024-05-01 07:29 am
devilsavocado) wrote2024-05-01 07:29 am
Entry tags:
expiation inbox
[ text - voice - video (he can't see it) ]
[ text - voice - video (he can't see it) ]
I'm with #2 on this one. Naivite is pretty broad. Criminal negligence would be one thing, but there's no real precedent for criminal naivite, that I know of.
That said, I don't think killing monsters is considered a crime, Peter.
That said, I don't think killing monsters is considered a crime, Peter.
First its not the killing monster thing its the psychopathic part that I am warning you guys about mostly
You guys might have a client very soon he did not seem sound of mind
Then why would they being me here over it it makes no sense its not even a crime
You guys might have a client very soon he did not seem sound of mind
Then why would they being me here over it it makes no sense its not even a crime
Edited 2024-05-11 17:44 (UTC)
[ Remember, he is daredevil Peter. ]
Some people find a sort of... cathartic release from indulging in violent tendencies. Obviously, like you said, it's not the sign of a sound mind, but unless he's doing something illegal like hurting people, or you have reason to believe he might hurt innocent people, it might be best to just keep your distance.
I can look into it, but I can't promise anything will come of it.
[ He can't resist being helpful, even if this sounds like a bad idea.]
It seems like they'll use anything to make a case against people here. The laws aren't consistent, and neither are their accusations. It might not be a crime in our world, but it might be one here.
Some people find a sort of... cathartic release from indulging in violent tendencies. Obviously, like you said, it's not the sign of a sound mind, but unless he's doing something illegal like hurting people, or you have reason to believe he might hurt innocent people, it might be best to just keep your distance.
I can look into it, but I can't promise anything will come of it.
[ He can't resist being helpful, even if this sounds like a bad idea.]
It seems like they'll use anything to make a case against people here. The laws aren't consistent, and neither are their accusations. It might not be a crime in our world, but it might be one here.
(yeah but daredevil is AWESOME and CRIMINAL ASS KICKING and COOL)
Sueing them maybe????
Sueing them maybe????
What's your basis for suing sashimi guy? He didn't hurt you, did he?
No not sashimi
The people who give us these crimes
The people who give us these crimes
Because your entire criteria is being from your world and I literally cannot make that happen.
Oh, yeah, you should definitely try and sue them.
Rules can change
If that shouldnt be the critetia what should
If that shouldnt be the critetia what should
I'm not going to fix your lazy criteria. Like I said, do better.
We can definitely start building a case. Though considering Jerry seems to take orders from fairies, it might be a bit of a toughie.
You think Jerry answers to Ben and not the Council?
I think the Council isn't composed strictly of humans. If your buddy Ben can boss him around, then it makes sense to me.
Fairies, Peter. They follow the rules, but they're weird rules.
In other words we'll have to do some digging before we make any moves.
In other words we'll have to do some digging before we make any moves.
Are we involving Peter, now? Is this a team up?
Hahaha why would you need me guys thats crazy
(peter parker age 16 nothing to see here nothing special)
(peter parker age 16 nothing to see here nothing special)
I don't know, why would we? You're the one that grouped us up.
Edited 2024-05-12 03:15 (UTC)
He's right, Peter. Plus you're not gonna have much luck hiding things from #2.
That said, you don't need to get involved in this unless you want to.
That said, you don't need to get involved in this unless you want to.
Page 5 of 10